Search This Blog

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

EDPC 603 Waiting For Superman Review

Here is my review on the film "Waiting For Superman" by Davis Guggenheim

Natasha Holder
EDPC 603

Waiting for Superman is a documentary outlining the problems within the educational system in the United States. The film examines charter school success, failing public schools, teacher tenure and teacher union issues. It also follows the grim story of several families on their journey to attend charter schools based on the lottery system. The film is filled with scary facts such as public high school students at a second grade reading levels, 68% of inmates are high school dropouts and the savings of prison vs. private schools being $24,000 per year. The film shows the American public education system as a failed enterprise. Waiting for Superman is both correct and mistaken in their reasoning as to why the system is failing. The film wants you to believe that all you need for education reform are more charter schools, removal of bad teachers and the unions that protect them and increased testing standards.  I believe the main issue in our educational system is the bureaucracy. Charter schools are great, but they are not the solution to the educational problems in the US as the film wants you to believe. The film fails to realize that there are good and bad charter schools just like there are good and bad public schools. It also fails to realize that there are other factors such as poverty, language barriers, and unstable homes to take into consideration as to why schools are failing.
One factor the film suggests that lack of funding in public schools is a problem. Charter schools receive millions of dollars in funding from private sources. If a public school received such funding, couldn’t it be just as successful? Guggenheim says that “failing neighborhoods cause failing schools” not the other way around.  What about the charter schools that are failing or are on comparable levels in reading and math levels as their neighboring public schools? One other factor that I don’t agree with is the fact that competition improves training. Instead, I believe it encourages cheating, hiding information and curriculum strategies. The film gives a one sided view of teachers unions. I do not completely agree with the film that teacher unions are the problem. Yes, unions need to be improved and more accountable. The majority of Finland’s and other developed countries with thriving schools are unionized. Why is that? There must be something that they are doing correctly that we can learn from. I would have also liked to see more interviews from teachers in the film. The film claims that good teachers make a difference, but I can only recall one brief interview of a teacher and not much teachers during classroom time was shown.
I do agree with some points such as using merit based systems, allowing innovation practices, and building stronger programs from preschool to development. We need to start rewarding the good teachers and stop making excuses for the bad ones that do not care and are only there for the paycheck, salary differentials and summers off. One positive approach that I have seen in a charter school are that students and teachers can be removed. This policy encourages parents and teachers to work harder to make sure children are doing their best.
To improve schools we need higher teacher salaries, better screening of teacher candidates, support and mentoring systems, better working conditions and to make surrounding neighborhoods better (afterschool programs or centers for students continued learning). You also need parents that care, students that want to learn, administration that allows you to explore and think outside the box, and afterschool programs. Children should be learning outside of the classroom.  One of the changes I support are to extend school days while allowing modification of the curriculum to allow teachers more freedom in methods of instruction. A typical school day of 6 hours is long when your day primarily consists of lecture. We need to allow teachers the autonomy of teaching using different approaches- neighborhood trips, technology lessons, dramas, plays as part of classroom instruction. We need to really examine what are we (USA) is doing wrong? Finnish teacher Pasi Sahlberg states, “We prepare children how to learn, not how to take a test.” Growing up, I was taught how to take a test and for the most part the same method exist. There are a variety of SAT and other prep books to teach you how to be a better test taker. The key is to teach students how to learn and understand the material. One issue is that no one is in support to change the system- innovative educators are met with resistance as seen by Michelle Rhee's efforts in Washington DC. We need this innovation to see what works and what doesn’t work. We should always be looking at ways to improve.
I appreciate the movie for enlightening us on the failing educational system. Although, I did not agree with all of its factors, Guggenheim has made some valid points. The film willingly or not, definitely made me feel angry and heartbroken for these families that are trying to give their children the best education but cannot. Parents and children that genuinely want to be better are forced to rely on a lottery system to get into a better school because of the neighborhood they live in. Slowly counting down the lottery spaces, while watching the fate of teary eyed parents and children really plays on our sympathy to support the “charter school movement.”  For me, this was a wake up call on the importance of not just being a good teacher but to also fight for change in administration and polices within the NYC educational system.




REFERENCES
Barr, Sam (2010). Review of “Waiting for Superman”. Retrieved from:      
Hancock, LynNell (2011). Why are Finland’s Schools Successful? Smithsonian.com Retrieved
Harvard Educational Review. (2010) Waiting for Superman. Retrieved from:   
Heilemann, John (2010). Schools: The Disaster Movie. Retrieved from:
Kipley, Amanda (2010). Waiting for Superman: A Call to Action for Our Schools. TIME, Retrieved from:
http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2019663_2020590_2020592,00.html



No comments:

Post a Comment